The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712 [electronic resource] : A Study of Epistemological Issues in Late 17th Century Cartesianism / by R. A. Watson.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789401029629
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/15601
Yazar
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 1966.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 1966.
Fiziksel Niteleme
VIII, 158 p. online resource.
Dizi
International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, 2215-0307 ; 11
İçindekiler Notu
I. Introduction -- A Characterization of a Scholastic Explanation of Perception and Knowing -- The Development of the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities before Descartes -- II. Simon Fougher -- Life and Works -- His Academic Scepticism and his Positive Position -- III. Late 17th Century Cartesian Metaphysics and Criticisms of it -- A Model Late 17th Century Cartesian Metaphysical System -- Foucher’s Major Criticisms of Cartesian Metaphysics -- IV. The Controversy Concerning Ideas Between Malebranche and Foucher -- Foucher’s Reading of the First Volume of the First Edition of Malebranche’s Recherche -- Foucher’s Criticisms of the Malebranchian Way of Ideas -- Malebranche’s Response to Foucher and the Failure of the Malebranchian Way of Ideas -- V. The Orthodox (Non-Occasionalist) Cartesian Way of Ideas -- Robert Desgabets: The Orthodox Cartesian Suggestion of Non-resembling Representative Ideas -- Foucher’s Reply to Desgabets -- Louis de La Forge: The Orthodox Cartesian Dependence upon God -- Jacque Rohault: The Denial of the Causal Likeness Principle -- Pierre-Sylvain Régis: The Dependence upon Inexplicable Causal Relations -- Antoine Le Grand: Ideas as Nature’s Signs -- Antoine Arnauld: Representative Perceptions -- VI. An Analysis of the Cartesian Failures to Solve Problems Facing Cartesianism -- Ideas as Natural Signs -- The Mechanical Notion of Causation -- External Ideas -- Direct Acquaintance -- The Cartesian Dependence upon the Likeness Principles and the Ontology of Substance and Modification -- VII. Post-Cartesian Developments of the Way of Ideas -- Monistic Solutions to Cartesian Problems -- John Locke -- George Berkeley -- David Hume -- VIII. Leibniz and Foucher -- The Correspondence between Leibniz and Foucher Concerning First Principles, Certain Knowledge,and the External World -- Leibniz’s New System and Foucher’s Criticisms of It -- Leibniz’s Notion of Matter -- Leibniz’s Solutions to Cartesian Problems -- IX. Conclusion -- Appendix I A Table of the Principles of a Lateth Century Cartesian Metaphysical System -- Appendix II. A Schematic Outline of Foucher’s Criticisms of Car- tesianism -- Index of Names.
Özet, vb.
Phenomenalism, idealism, spiritualism, and other contemporary philo sophical movements originating in the reflective experience of the cogito witness to the immense influence of Descartes. However, Carte sianism as a complete metaphysical system in the image of that of the master collapsed early in the 18th century. A small school of brilliant Cartesians, almost all expert in the new mechanistic science, flashed like meteors upon the intellectual world of late 17th century France to win well-deserved recognition for Cartesianism. They were accompanied by a scintillating comet, Ma1ebranche, the deviant Cartesian, now remembered as the orthodox Cartesians are not. However, all these bright lights faded upon the philosophical horizon, almost as soon as they appeared. The metaphysical dualism of Des cartes was, as such, neither to be preserved nor reconstructed. There are many reasons why the Cartesian system did not survive the victory over Scholasticism which Descartes, Malebranche, and the others had won. Newtonian physics very soon replaced Cartesian physics. The practical interest and success of the new science which the Cartesians themselves had nurtured drew men down from the lofty realms of metaphysics. On the popular front, Cartesianism was attacked and ridiculed for the view that animals are unthinking machines. In the schools of Paris and elsewhere, there was the general but severe opposition of pedants, which is perhaps of more historical than philosophical interest.
Konu
History.
Philosophy, Modern.
History.
Early Modern Philosophy.
Philosophy, Modern.
History.
Early Modern Philosophy.
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 06372nam a22005655i 4500
001 814362
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130220128
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1966 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401029629|9978-94-010-2962-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-2962-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aD1-2027
072 7|aHB|2bicssc
072 7|aHBAH|2bicssc
072 7|aHIS000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aNH|2thema
072 7|aNHAH|2thema
082 04|a900|223
090 |aDK/15601
100 1 |aWatson, R. A.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 14|aThe Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712|h[electronic resource] :|bA Study of Epistemological Issues in Late 17th Century Cartesianism /|cby R. A. Watson.
250 |a1st ed. 1966.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1966.
300 |aVIII, 158 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aInternational Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées,|x2215-0307 ;|v11
505 0 |aI. Introduction -- A Characterization of a Scholastic Explanation of Perception and Knowing -- The Development of the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities before Descartes -- II. Simon Fougher -- Life and Works -- His Academic Scepticism and his Positive Position -- III. Late 17th Century Cartesian Metaphysics and Criticisms of it -- A Model Late 17th Century Cartesian Metaphysical System -- Foucher’s Major Criticisms of Cartesian Metaphysics -- IV. The Controversy Concerning Ideas Between Malebranche and Foucher -- Foucher’s Reading of the First Volume of the First Edition of Malebranche’s Recherche -- Foucher’s Criticisms of the Malebranchian Way of Ideas -- Malebranche’s Response to Foucher and the Failure of the Malebranchian Way of Ideas -- V. The Orthodox (Non-Occasionalist) Cartesian Way of Ideas -- Robert Desgabets: The Orthodox Cartesian Suggestion of Non-resembling Representative Ideas -- Foucher’s Reply to Desgabets -- Louis de La Forge: The Orthodox Cartesian Dependence upon God -- Jacque Rohault: The Denial of the Causal Likeness Principle -- Pierre-Sylvain Régis: The Dependence upon Inexplicable Causal Relations -- Antoine Le Grand: Ideas as Nature’s Signs -- Antoine Arnauld: Representative Perceptions -- VI. An Analysis of the Cartesian Failures to Solve Problems Facing Cartesianism -- Ideas as Natural Signs -- The Mechanical Notion of Causation -- External Ideas -- Direct Acquaintance -- The Cartesian Dependence upon the Likeness Principles and the Ontology of Substance and Modification -- VII. Post-Cartesian Developments of the Way of Ideas -- Monistic Solutions to Cartesian Problems -- John Locke -- George Berkeley -- David Hume -- VIII. Leibniz and Foucher -- The Correspondence between Leibniz and Foucher Concerning First Principles, Certain Knowledge,and the External World -- Leibniz’s New System and Foucher’s Criticisms of It -- Leibniz’s Notion of Matter -- Leibniz’s Solutions to Cartesian Problems -- IX. Conclusion -- Appendix I A Table of the Principles of a Lateth Century Cartesian Metaphysical System -- Appendix II. A Schematic Outline of Foucher’s Criticisms of Car- tesianism -- Index of Names.
520 |aPhenomenalism, idealism, spiritualism, and other contemporary philo sophical movements originating in the reflective experience of the cogito witness to the immense influence of Descartes. However, Carte sianism as a complete metaphysical system in the image of that of the master collapsed early in the 18th century. A small school of brilliant Cartesians, almost all expert in the new mechanistic science, flashed like meteors upon the intellectual world of late 17th century France to win well-deserved recognition for Cartesianism. They were accompanied by a scintillating comet, Ma1ebranche, the deviant Cartesian, now remembered as the orthodox Cartesians are not. However, all these bright lights faded upon the philosophical horizon, almost as soon as they appeared. The metaphysical dualism of Des cartes was, as such, neither to be preserved nor reconstructed. There are many reasons why the Cartesian system did not survive the victory over Scholasticism which Descartes, Malebranche, and the others had won. Newtonian physics very soon replaced Cartesian physics. The practical interest and success of the new science which the Cartesians themselves had nurtured drew men down from the lofty realms of metaphysics. On the popular front, Cartesianism was attacked and ridiculed for the view that animals are unthinking machines. In the schools of Paris and elsewhere, there was the general but severe opposition of pedants, which is perhaps of more historical than philosophical interest.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aHistory.
650 0|aPhilosophy, Modern.
650 14|aHistory.
650 24|aEarly Modern Philosophy.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024701872
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401029636
830 0|aInternational Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées,|x2215-0307 ;|v11
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2962-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXH
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aHistory (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)
001 814362
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130220128
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121227s1966 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401029629|9978-94-010-2962-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-010-2962-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aD1-2027
072 7|aHB|2bicssc
072 7|aHBAH|2bicssc
072 7|aHIS000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aNH|2thema
072 7|aNHAH|2thema
082 04|a900|223
090 |aDK/15601
100 1 |aWatson, R. A.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 14|aThe Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712|h[electronic resource] :|bA Study of Epistemological Issues in Late 17th Century Cartesianism /|cby R. A. Watson.
250 |a1st ed. 1966.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1966.
300 |aVIII, 158 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aInternational Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées,|x2215-0307 ;|v11
505 0 |aI. Introduction -- A Characterization of a Scholastic Explanation of Perception and Knowing -- The Development of the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities before Descartes -- II. Simon Fougher -- Life and Works -- His Academic Scepticism and his Positive Position -- III. Late 17th Century Cartesian Metaphysics and Criticisms of it -- A Model Late 17th Century Cartesian Metaphysical System -- Foucher’s Major Criticisms of Cartesian Metaphysics -- IV. The Controversy Concerning Ideas Between Malebranche and Foucher -- Foucher’s Reading of the First Volume of the First Edition of Malebranche’s Recherche -- Foucher’s Criticisms of the Malebranchian Way of Ideas -- Malebranche’s Response to Foucher and the Failure of the Malebranchian Way of Ideas -- V. The Orthodox (Non-Occasionalist) Cartesian Way of Ideas -- Robert Desgabets: The Orthodox Cartesian Suggestion of Non-resembling Representative Ideas -- Foucher’s Reply to Desgabets -- Louis de La Forge: The Orthodox Cartesian Dependence upon God -- Jacque Rohault: The Denial of the Causal Likeness Principle -- Pierre-Sylvain Régis: The Dependence upon Inexplicable Causal Relations -- Antoine Le Grand: Ideas as Nature’s Signs -- Antoine Arnauld: Representative Perceptions -- VI. An Analysis of the Cartesian Failures to Solve Problems Facing Cartesianism -- Ideas as Natural Signs -- The Mechanical Notion of Causation -- External Ideas -- Direct Acquaintance -- The Cartesian Dependence upon the Likeness Principles and the Ontology of Substance and Modification -- VII. Post-Cartesian Developments of the Way of Ideas -- Monistic Solutions to Cartesian Problems -- John Locke -- George Berkeley -- David Hume -- VIII. Leibniz and Foucher -- The Correspondence between Leibniz and Foucher Concerning First Principles, Certain Knowledge,and the External World -- Leibniz’s New System and Foucher’s Criticisms of It -- Leibniz’s Notion of Matter -- Leibniz’s Solutions to Cartesian Problems -- IX. Conclusion -- Appendix I A Table of the Principles of a Lateth Century Cartesian Metaphysical System -- Appendix II. A Schematic Outline of Foucher’s Criticisms of Car- tesianism -- Index of Names.
520 |aPhenomenalism, idealism, spiritualism, and other contemporary philo sophical movements originating in the reflective experience of the cogito witness to the immense influence of Descartes. However, Carte sianism as a complete metaphysical system in the image of that of the master collapsed early in the 18th century. A small school of brilliant Cartesians, almost all expert in the new mechanistic science, flashed like meteors upon the intellectual world of late 17th century France to win well-deserved recognition for Cartesianism. They were accompanied by a scintillating comet, Ma1ebranche, the deviant Cartesian, now remembered as the orthodox Cartesians are not. However, all these bright lights faded upon the philosophical horizon, almost as soon as they appeared. The metaphysical dualism of Des cartes was, as such, neither to be preserved nor reconstructed. There are many reasons why the Cartesian system did not survive the victory over Scholasticism which Descartes, Malebranche, and the others had won. Newtonian physics very soon replaced Cartesian physics. The practical interest and success of the new science which the Cartesians themselves had nurtured drew men down from the lofty realms of metaphysics. On the popular front, Cartesianism was attacked and ridiculed for the view that animals are unthinking machines. In the schools of Paris and elsewhere, there was the general but severe opposition of pedants, which is perhaps of more historical than philosophical interest.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aHistory.
650 0|aPhilosophy, Modern.
650 14|aHistory.
650 24|aEarly Modern Philosophy.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789024701872
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401029636
830 0|aInternational Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées,|x2215-0307 ;|v11
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2962-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXH
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aHistory (R0) (SpringerNature-43722)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
