Philosophical Logic [electronic resource] / by Robert L. Arrington, Peter M. Burkholder, Shannon Dubose, James W. Dye, James K. Feibleman, Bertrand P. Helm, Max Hocutt, Harold N. Lee, Louise N. Roberts, John C. Sallis, Donald H. Weiss.

Erişim Adresi
Link
ISBN
9789401034975
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/16063
Yazar
Arrington, Robert L.
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 1967.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 1967.
Fiziksel Niteleme
VIII, 162 p. online resource.
Dizi
Tulane Studies in Philosophy ; 16
İçindekiler Notu
The Logic of our Language -- Petitio in the Strife of Systems -- Observations on the Uses of Order -- Cultural Relativity and the Logic of Philosophy -- A Material Theory of Reference -- On Letting -- On the Illogic of the Mental -- On the Uses and Interpretation of Logical Symbols -- Notes on a Past Logic of Time -- The Problem of Judgment in Husserl’s Later Thought -- Philosophical Logic and Psychological Satisfaction.
Özet, vb.
With this issue we initiate the policy of expanding the scope of Tulane Studies in Philosophy to include, in addition to the work of members of the department, contributions from philosophers who have earned advanced degrees from Tulane and who are now teaching in other colleges and universities. The Editor THE LOGIC OF OUR LANGUAGE ROBERT L. ARRINGTON Wittgenstein wrote in the Tractatus that "logic is not a body of doctrine, but a mirror-image of the world. " 1 In line with his suggestion that a proposition is a 'picture', Wittgenstein argued that propositions 'show' the logical structure of the real. He was insistent, however, that "the apparent logical form of a proposition need not be its real one. " 2 As a result of this we can misunderstand the structure of fact. Philosophical problems arise just when "the logic of our language is mis­ understood. " 3 It is common knowledge that much of this view of logic was rejected by Wittgenstein himself in the Philosophical Investi­ gations. There we are told that language has no ideal or sublime 4 logic which mirrors the structure of the extra-linguistic world. Consequently, inferences from the structure of language to the structure of that extra-linguistic world are invalid. Reality can be 'cut up' in any of a number of ways by language. Wittgenstein adopted a view of philosophy which would render that discipline a non-explanatory, non-critical study of the multiple ways in which language can be used.
Konu
Philosophy.
Logic.
Philosophy.
Logic.
Diğer Yazarlar
Burkholder, Peter M.
Dubose, Shannon.
Dye, James W.
Feibleman, James K.
Helm, Bertrand P.
Hocutt, Max.
Lee, Harold N.
Roberts, Louise N.
Sallis, John C.
Weiss, Donald H.
Kurum Adı
SpringerLink (Online service)
İşlemler