LEADER 03912nam a22005775i 4500
001 814833
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130213731
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 100301s2008 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783540699651|9978-3-540-69965-1
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-540-69965-1|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aJZ2-6530
072 7|aJPS|2bicssc
072 7|aPOL011000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJPS|2thema
082 04|a327|223
090 |aDK/16070
245 10|aAbuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanisms?|h[electronic resource] /|cedited by Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt, Beatriz Conde Gallego, Stefan Enchelmaier.
250 |a1st ed. 2008.
264 1|aBerlin, Heidelberg :|bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :|bImprint: Springer,|c2008.
300 |aXI, 204 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aMPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law,|x2191-5830 ;|v5
505 0 |aThe Reform of Article 82 EC in the Light of the “Economic Approach” -- Is there a Role for Market Definition and Dominance in an effects-based Approach? -- Abuse below the Threshold of Dominance? Market Power, Market Dominance, and Abuse of Economic Dependence -- Efficiency Defence in Article 82 EC -- From Courage v Crehan to the White Paper – The Changing Landscape of European Private Enforcement and the Possible Implications for Article 82 EC Litigation -- Private Enforcement – Is Article 82 EC special? -- Private Incentive, Optimal Deterrence and Damage Claims for Abuses of Dominant Positions – The Interaction between the Economic Review of the Prohibition of Abuses of Dominant Positions and Private Enforcement -- The Role of Consumer Associations in the Enforcement of Article 82 EC.
520 |aAs part of its review of competition law that started in the late 1990s, the European Commission proposes to revise its interpretation and application of the Treaty’s prohibition of abuses of dominant positions. Also, it has instigated a debate about the promotion of private enforcement of EC competition law. On the former subject, the Commission published a Discussion Paper in 2005; on the latter, a Green Paper in 2005, followed by a White Paper in 2008. The chapters in this volume critically appraise the Commission’s proposals, including the most recent ones. The authors also highlight the repercussions of the proposed ‘more economic approach’ to abuses of dominant positions on private litigants’ opportunities to bring damages actions in national courts for such abuses.
650 0|aInternational relations.
650 0|aCommercial law.
650 0|aInternational law.
650 0|aTrade regulation.
650 0|aEurope|xEconomic integration.
650 14|aInternational Relations.
650 24|aCommercial Law.
650 24|aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
650 24|aEuropean Economic Integration.
700 1 |aMackenrodt, Mark-Oliver.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aConde Gallego, Beatriz.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 |aEnchelmaier, Stefan.|eeditor.|4edt|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783540699583
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783540866305
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783642089411
830 0|aMPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law,|x2191-5830 ;|v5
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69965-1
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXPI
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)