Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content [electronic resource] / by Eva Hajicová, Barbara B.H. Partee, P. Sgall.
Erişim Adresi
ISBN
9789401590129
Dil Kodu
İngilizce
Yer Numarası
DK/16369
Yazar
Basım Bildirimi
1st ed. 1998.
Yayın Bilgisi
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 1998.
Fiziksel Niteleme
IX, 218 p. online resource.
Dizi
Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 2215-034X ; 71
İçindekiler Notu
1. Introduction -- 2. Towards an investigation of the relation between topic-focus articulation and tripartite structures -- 3. Remarks on common background and shared assumptions -- 4. Obstacles to joint work -- 5. Dialogue, progressing towards a common basis for discussion -- 6. Some hypotheses proposed and examined -- 7. Future directions -- References -- List of abbreviations -- Name index.
Özet, vb.
1. 1 OBJECTIVES The main objective of this joint work is to bring together some ideas that have played central roles in two disparate theoretical traditions in order to con tribute to a better understanding of the relationship between focus and the syn tactic and semantic structure of sentences. Within the Prague School tradition and the branch of its contemporary development represented by Hajicova and Sgall (HS in the sequel), topic-focus articulation has long been a central object of study, and it has long been a tenet of Prague school linguistics that topic-focus structure has systematic relevance to meaning. Within the formal semantics tradition represented by Partee (BHP in the sequel), focus has much more recently become an area of concerted investigation, but a number of the semantic phenomena to which focus is relevant have been extensively investi gated and given explicit compositional semantic-analyses. The emergence of 'tripartite structures' (see Chapter 2) in formal semantics and the partial simi larities that can be readily observed between some aspects of tripartite structures and some aspects of Praguian topic-focus articulation have led us to expect that a closer investigation of the similarities and differences in these different theoretical constructs would be a rewarding undertaking with mutual benefits for the further development of our respective theories and potential benefit for the study of semantic effects of focus in other theories as well.
Konu
Linguistics.
Language and languages __ Philosophy.
Semiotics.
Computational linguistics.
Comparative linguistics.
Theoretical Linguistics / Grammar.
Philosophy of Language.
Semiotics.
Computational Linguistics.
Comparative Linguistics.
Language and languages __ Philosophy.
Semiotics.
Computational linguistics.
Comparative linguistics.
Theoretical Linguistics / Grammar.
Philosophy of Language.
Semiotics.
Computational Linguistics.
Comparative Linguistics.
Diğer Yazarlar
Kurum Adı
Eseri Alıntıla
Referansları kullanmadan önce gözden geçirmeniz ve varsa gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmanız önerilir.
Dijital Kaynak
MARC Görünümü
LEADER 04889nam a22006495i 4500
001 815133
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130212111
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130220s1998 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401590129|9978-94-015-9012-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-015-9012-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aP1-1091
072 7|aCF|2bicssc
072 7|aLAN009000|2bisacsh
072 7|aCF|2thema
082 04|a410.1|223
090 |aDK/16369
100 1 |aHajicová, Eva.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aTopic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content|h[electronic resource] /|cby Eva Hajicová, Barbara B.H. Partee, P. Sgall.
250 |a1st ed. 1998.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1998.
300 |aIX, 218 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aStudies in Linguistics and Philosophy,|x2215-034X ;|v71
505 0 |a1. Introduction -- 2. Towards an investigation of the relation between topic-focus articulation and tripartite structures -- 3. Remarks on common background and shared assumptions -- 4. Obstacles to joint work -- 5. Dialogue, progressing towards a common basis for discussion -- 6. Some hypotheses proposed and examined -- 7. Future directions -- References -- List of abbreviations -- Name index.
520 |a1. 1 OBJECTIVES The main objective of this joint work is to bring together some ideas that have played central roles in two disparate theoretical traditions in order to con tribute to a better understanding of the relationship between focus and the syn tactic and semantic structure of sentences. Within the Prague School tradition and the branch of its contemporary development represented by Hajicova and Sgall (HS in the sequel), topic-focus articulation has long been a central object of study, and it has long been a tenet of Prague school linguistics that topic-focus structure has systematic relevance to meaning. Within the formal semantics tradition represented by Partee (BHP in the sequel), focus has much more recently become an area of concerted investigation, but a number of the semantic phenomena to which focus is relevant have been extensively investi gated and given explicit compositional semantic-analyses. The emergence of 'tripartite structures' (see Chapter 2) in formal semantics and the partial simi larities that can be readily observed between some aspects of tripartite structures and some aspects of Praguian topic-focus articulation have led us to expect that a closer investigation of the similarities and differences in these different theoretical constructs would be a rewarding undertaking with mutual benefits for the further development of our respective theories and potential benefit for the study of semantic effects of focus in other theories as well.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aLinguistics.
650 0|aLanguage and languages|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aSemiotics.
650 0|aComputational linguistics.
650 0|aComparative linguistics.
650 14|aTheoretical Linguistics / Grammar.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Language.
650 24|aSemiotics.
650 24|aComputational Linguistics.
650 24|aComparative Linguistics.
700 1 |aPartee, Barbara B.H.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
700 1 |aSgall, P.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792352891
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048151165
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401590136
830 0|aStudies in Linguistics and Philosophy,|x2215-034X ;|v71
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9012-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)
001 815133
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130212111
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 130220s1998 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789401590129|9978-94-015-9012-9
024 7 |a10.1007/978-94-015-9012-9|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aP1-1091
072 7|aCF|2bicssc
072 7|aLAN009000|2bisacsh
072 7|aCF|2thema
082 04|a410.1|223
090 |aDK/16369
100 1 |aHajicová, Eva.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aTopic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content|h[electronic resource] /|cby Eva Hajicová, Barbara B.H. Partee, P. Sgall.
250 |a1st ed. 1998.
264 1|aDordrecht :|bSpringer Netherlands :|bImprint: Springer,|c1998.
300 |aIX, 218 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aStudies in Linguistics and Philosophy,|x2215-034X ;|v71
505 0 |a1. Introduction -- 2. Towards an investigation of the relation between topic-focus articulation and tripartite structures -- 3. Remarks on common background and shared assumptions -- 4. Obstacles to joint work -- 5. Dialogue, progressing towards a common basis for discussion -- 6. Some hypotheses proposed and examined -- 7. Future directions -- References -- List of abbreviations -- Name index.
520 |a1. 1 OBJECTIVES The main objective of this joint work is to bring together some ideas that have played central roles in two disparate theoretical traditions in order to con tribute to a better understanding of the relationship between focus and the syn tactic and semantic structure of sentences. Within the Prague School tradition and the branch of its contemporary development represented by Hajicova and Sgall (HS in the sequel), topic-focus articulation has long been a central object of study, and it has long been a tenet of Prague school linguistics that topic-focus structure has systematic relevance to meaning. Within the formal semantics tradition represented by Partee (BHP in the sequel), focus has much more recently become an area of concerted investigation, but a number of the semantic phenomena to which focus is relevant have been extensively investi gated and given explicit compositional semantic-analyses. The emergence of 'tripartite structures' (see Chapter 2) in formal semantics and the partial simi larities that can be readily observed between some aspects of tripartite structures and some aspects of Praguian topic-focus articulation have led us to expect that a closer investigation of the similarities and differences in these different theoretical constructs would be a rewarding undertaking with mutual benefits for the further development of our respective theories and potential benefit for the study of semantic effects of focus in other theories as well.
532 8 |aAccessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or described non-text content (images, graphs etc). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com if you require assistance or an alternative format.
532 8 |aInaccessible, or known limited accessibility
532 8 |aNo reading system accessibility options actively disabled
532 8 |aPublisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com
650 0|aLinguistics.
650 0|aLanguage and languages|xPhilosophy.
650 0|aSemiotics.
650 0|aComputational linguistics.
650 0|aComparative linguistics.
650 14|aTheoretical Linguistics / Grammar.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Language.
650 24|aSemiotics.
650 24|aComputational Linguistics.
650 24|aComparative Linguistics.
700 1 |aPartee, Barbara B.H.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
700 1 |aSgall, P.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9780792352891
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789048151165
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789401590136
830 0|aStudies in Linguistics and Philosophy,|x2215-034X ;|v71
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9012-9
912 |aZDB-2-SHU
912 |aZDB-2-SXS
912 |aZDB-2-BAE
950 |aHumanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 |aSocial Sciences (R0) (SpringerNature-43726)
Materyaller
Depodan talep edilen materyal sadece kütüphane içerisinde kullanılmaktadır.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
Materyal dışarıya ödünç verilmemektedir.
