LEADER 03577nam a22005055i 4500
001 815974
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130203855
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 190205s2019 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783030060527|9978-3-030-06052-7
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-030-06052-7|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aBL65.P7
072 7|aHRAM2|2bicssc
072 7|aREL084000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQRAM2|2thema
082 04|a322.1|223
090 |aDK/17192
100 1 |aWest, Ellis M.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 14|aThe Free Exercise of Religion in America|h[electronic resource] :|bIts Original Constitutional Meaning /|cby Ellis M. West.
250 |a1st ed. 2019.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,|c2019.
300 |aXIV, 317 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |a1. Introduction -- 2. Constitutional Rights and Ascertaining their Original Meaning -- 3. Setting the Stage -- 4. The Meaning of Religious Liberty in Virginia -- 5. The Meaning of Religious Liberty in the Other Southern States -- 6. The Meaning of Religious Liberty in the Middle States -- 7. The Meaning of Religious Liberty in the New England States -- 8. Initial Conclusion -- 9. The Constitutional Meaning of Religious Freedom: Part One -- 10. The Constitutional Meaning of Religious Freedom: Part Two -- 11. Final Conclusion.
520 |aThis book explains the original meaning of the two religion clauses of the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law [1] respecting an establishment of religion or [2] prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” As the book shows, both clauses were intended to protect the free exercise of religion or religious freedom. West shows the position taken by early Americans on four issues: (1) the general meaning of the “free exercise of religion,” including whether it is different from the meaning of “no establishment of religion”; (2) whether the free exercise of religion may be intentionally and directly limited, and if so, under what circumstances; (3) whether laws regulating temporal matters that also have a religious sanction violate the free exercise of religion; and (4) whether the free exercise of religion gives persons a right to be exempt from obeying valid civil laws that unintentionally and indirectly make it difficult or impossible to practice their religion in some way.A definitive work on the subject and a major contribution to the field of constitutional law and history, this volume is key to a better understanding of the ongoing constitutional adjudication based on the religion clauses of the First Amendment.
650 0|aReligion and politics.
650 0|aAmerica|xPolitics and government.
650 0|aConstitutional law.
650 0|aReligion and sociology.
650 14|aPolitics and Religion.
650 24|aAmerican Politics.
650 24|aConstitutional Law.
650 24|aSociology of Religion.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030060510
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030060534
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06052-7
912 |aZDB-2-POS
912 |aZDB-2-SXPI
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)