LEADER 03568nam a22004935i 4500
001 817053
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130192012
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210107s2021 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783030598013|9978-3-030-59801-3
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-030-59801-3|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aJZ6378-6405
072 7|aJW|2bicssc
072 7|aPOL069000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJW|2thema
082 04|a355|223
090 |aDK/18265
100 1 |aChappell, Brian K.|eauthor.|0(orcid)0009-0002-2804-3638|1https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2804-3638|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aState Responses to Nuclear Proliferation|h[electronic resource] :|bThe Differential Effects of Threat Perception /|cby Brian K. Chappell.
250 |a1st ed. 2021.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,|c2021.
300 |aXLVIII, 412 p. 17 illus., 14 illus. in color.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |a1. Introduction to The Study -- 2. Literature Review -- 3. Cognitive Psychological Influences -- 4. National Security Policy -- 5. Military Doctrine and Power Projection Capability -- 6.The Middle East States And Threat Perceptions -- 7. Analysis Of Data -- 8. Conclusion.
520 |aContemporary fears of rogue state nuclear proliferation and nuclear terrorism pose unique challenges for the global community. This book offers a unique approach by examining why states that have the military capability to severely damage a proliferating state’s nuclear program instead choose to pursue coercive diplomacy. The author argues cognitive psychological influences, including the trauma derived from national tragedies like the September 11th attacks and the Holocaust, and a history of armed conflict increase the threat perceptions of foreign policy decision-makers when confronting a state perceived to be challenging the existing power structure by pursuing a nuclear weapon. The powerful state’s degree of perceived threat, combined with its national security policies, military power projection capabilities, and public support then influence whether it will take no action, use coercive diplomacy/sanctions, or employ military force to address the weaker state’s nuclear ambitions. Brian K. Chappell, PhD served twenty-eight years in the United States Air Force and is a veteran of the Afghanistan War. He is a career Nuclear and Missile Operations Officer and has served as a Middle East policy senior advisor to the Under Secretary of the Air Force for International Affairs, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy.
650 0|aPolitics and war.
650 0|aSecurity, International.
650 0|aInternational relations.
650 14|aMilitary and Defence Studies.
650 24|aInternational Security Studies.
650 24|aInternational Relations Theory.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030598006
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030598020
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783030598037
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59801-3
912 |aZDB-2-POS
912 |aZDB-2-SXPI
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)