LEADER 04375nam a22005175i 4500
001 817568
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130185321
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 211120s2022 si | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9789811666711|9978-981-16-6671-1
024 7 |a10.1007/978-981-16-6671-1|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aJZ2-6530
072 7|aJPS|2bicssc
072 7|aPOL028000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJPS|2thema
082 04|a327.1|223
090 |aDK/18779
100 1 |aThompson, William R.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aAnalyzing Strategic Rivalries in World Politics|h[electronic resource] :|bTypes of Rivalry, Regional Variation, and Escalation/De-escalation /|cby William R. Thompson, Kentaro Sakuwa, Prashant Hosur Suhas.
250 |a1st ed. 2022.
264 1|aSingapore :|bSpringer Nature Singapore :|bImprint: Springer,|c2022.
300 |aVIII, 291 p. 32 illus., 19 illus. in color.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
490 1 |aEvidence-Based Approaches to Peace and Conflict Studies,|x2730-566X ;|v4
520 |aStrategic rivalries are contests between states that view one another as threatening competitors and treat each other as enemies. A disproportionate amount of interstate conflict is generated by a relatively small number of these pairs of states engaged in rivalries that can persist for years. Thus, to understand interstate peace and conflict, it is useful to know how rivalries work in general and more specifically. In the past two decades, a strenuous effort has been mounted to introduce the concept of rivalry and demonstrate its utility in unraveling conflict situations. Yet all rivalries are not exactly alike. We need to move to a more rewarding differentiation of how they differ in general. Principal rivalries are those antagonisms that are most significant to the decision makers in a state. The main distinction on issues about which rivals dispute are positional and spatial concerns. Positional rivalries contend over regional and global influence. Spatial rivals contend over which state deserves to control disputed territory. Interventionary rivalries predominate in sub-Saharan Africa. Their primary focus involves neighboring states attempting to influence who rules and how co-ethnics are treated. This book updates the inventory of strategic rivalries from 1816 to 2020. Principal rivalries are identified for the first time and cover the same period. A theory stressing the two main types of rivalry (positional and spatial) is elaborated and tested. Regional variations on the origins and terminations of spatial rivalry are explored and interpreted. In addition, attention is paid to fluctuations in the intensity of positional rivalries by examining the working of the contemporary major power triangle (United States, Soviet Union/Russia, and China) and, more generally, the dynamics of regional power that are rising in terms of their relative capability and status in the system. Variations in cooperation and termination dynamics both in general andaccording to rivalry type are also examined. Overall, the emphases of the book are split between demonstrating the utility of distinguishing among rivalry types and examining selected rivalry dynamics.
650 0|aInternational relations.
650 0|aSecurity, International.
650 14|aForeign Policy.
650 24|aInternational Relations Theory.
650 24|aInternational Security Studies.
700 1 |aSakuwa, Kentaro.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
700 1 |aSuhas, Prashant Hosur.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789811666704
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789811666728
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9789811666735
830 0|aEvidence-Based Approaches to Peace and Conflict Studies,|x2730-566X ;|v4
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6671-1
912 |aZDB-2-POS
912 |aZDB-2-SXPI
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)