LEADER 03327nam a22005175i 4500
001 818856
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260130175734
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 161126s2017 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9783319411835|9978-3-319-41183-5
024 7 |a10.1007/978-3-319-41183-5|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aJA85-85.2
072 7|aJPH|2bicssc
072 7|aGTC|2bicssc
072 7|aPOL000000|2bisacsh
072 7|aJPH|2thema
072 7|aGTC|2thema
082 04|a320.014|223
090 |aDK/20064
100 1 |aTaylor, J. Benjamin.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aExtreme Media and American Politics|h[electronic resource] :|bIn Defense of Extremity /|cby J. Benjamin Taylor.
250 |a1st ed. 2017.
264 1|aCham :|bSpringer International Publishing :|bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,|c2017.
300 |aXII, 230 p. 18 illus.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
505 0 |aPlacing Extreme Television Media In Their Historical And Economic Context -- A Deep Dive Into Extreme Television Media Selection -- The Educative Effects Of Extreme Television Media -- Exploring The Effect Of Extreme Media On Political -- The Puzzle Of Extreme Media And Political Tolerance: An Immigration Case Study -- Political Behavior And Extreme Television Media Consumption -- The Meaning And Future Of Extreme Media In American Politics.
520 |aThis book asks: what are extreme television media, and are they actually bad for American politics? Taylor explores these questions, and how these media affect political knowledge, trust, efficacy, tolerance, policy attitudes, and political behaviors. Using experiments and data from the National Annenberg Election Study, this book shows how extreme media create both positive and negative externalities in American politics. Many criticize these media because of their bombastic nature, but bombast and affect also create positive effects for some consumers. Previous research shows partisan media exacerbate polarization, and those findings are taken further on immigration policy here. However, they also increase political knowledge, increase internal efficacy, and cause their viewers to engage in informal political behaviors like political discussion and advocacy. The findings suggest there is much to be gained from these media market entrepreneurs, and we should be wary of paintingwith too broad a brush about their negative effects.
650 0|aCommunication in politics.
650 0|aAmerica|xPolitics and government.
650 0|aCommunication.
650 14|aPolitical Communication.
650 24|aAmerican Politics.
650 24|aMedia and Communication.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319411828
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319411842
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9783319822877
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41183-5
912 |aZDB-2-POS
912 |aZDB-2-SXPI
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 |aPolitical Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)