LEADER 02202nam a22005055i 4500
001 826011
003 TR_AnAIT
005 20260131080620
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 151222s2005 xxk| s |||| 0|eng d
020 |a9780230501195|9978-0-230-50119-5
024 7 |a10.1057/9780230501195|2doi
041 |aeng
049 |aTürk Tarih Kurumu Kütüphanesi
050 4|aB1-5802
072 7|aHPC|2bicssc
072 7|aPHI009000|2bisacsh
072 7|aQDH|2thema
082 04|a109|223
090 |aDK/27113
100 1 |aBanham, G.|eauthor.|4aut|4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
245 10|aKant's Transcendental Imagination|h[electronic resource] /|cby G. Banham.
250 |a1st ed. 2005.
264 1|aLondon :|bPalgrave Macmillan UK :|bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,|c2005.
300 |aXIII, 331 p.|bonline resource.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
347 |atext file|bPDF|2rda
520 |aThe role and place of transcendental psychology in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason has been a source of some contention. The acceptance of the notion of transcendental psychology in recent years has been in connection to functionalist views of the mind which has detracted from its metaphysical significance. This work presents a detailed argument for restoring transcendental psychology to a central place in the interpretation of Kant's Analytic, in the process providing a detailed response to more 'austere' analytic readings.
650 0|aPhilosophy|xHistory.
650 0|aPhilosophy of mind.
650 0|aPhenomenology .
650 0|aLogic.
650 14|aHistory of Philosophy.
650 24|aPhilosophy of Mind.
650 24|aPhenomenology.
650 24|aLogic.
710 2 |aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 |tSpringer Nature eBook
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781403916891
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781349513093
776 08|iPrinted edition:|z9781349513109
856 40|uhttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501195
912 |aZDB-2-PRE
912 |aZDB-2-SXPR
950 |aPalgrave Religion & Philosophy Collection (SpringerNature-41145)
950 |aPhilosophy and Religion (R0) (SpringerNature-43725)